Sustainable Eating:
[rmolivand.com]

No to the Paris Climate Accord. Why in the hell we should stymie our progress when China and India are exempt from it?

I ride the city bus and use ride sharing to get my stuff home from the store. Sadly my footprint is mostly due to having to shop online for stuff.

We need to promote safe nuclear power, including SMRs, MSRs, SMMSRs and accelerate the development of
effective Fusion reactors.

This survey is insane as it doesn’t even mention chicken and pork which are raised entirely on grains and other products which use a lot of energy to produce while a lot of the beef comes from grass or forages raised on marginal land not suitable for farming.

also, two regrets:

• I don't do much any more to shop for local farmer organic production. I've been on community supported agriculture programs in the past but not any more.
• My water is probably relatively high carbon, including some complicated expensive whole-house processing I do on it to remove the hardness and impurities.

Unfortunately, there is not a reply button to all those who retorted to my comment but I will address all of them. None of you who replied addressed my main point setting our industry back in favor of China and India. Each one of them have more than three times our populations. China is polluting at a level seen only during the Industrial Revolution. India is getting there as more people join the middle class and buy automobiles. I do not like big government solutions. This will lead to carbon credits, an economic bubble unlike the world has ever seen, which will pass down higher energy costs to the consumer. Besides, everyone, including me, cans do their part like cultivation of a garden(s), planting trees, or grabbing a garbage bag and a pokey stick and picking up litter on the side of the road. Yeah, let’s hand more power to big, multinational governing bodies or corporations.

I generally buy most of my clothes from charity shops (except for socks and undies). As for beef, I don't eat a lot of it but I do consume a lot of dairy products. Which I think is more of a problem than beef production.

Something else?

Rapturously funny but still embarrassing to see so many allegedly rejecting nonsense of gods whilst continuing to cling to such androcentric scientism, 'cherry picked' like so many scriptures from the deluded public domain.

Can there possibly be another cleaner term to describe 'atheist' that would be free of ASSociation with these Chicken Littles?

Having cut most of these things anyway, (comes of being a pensioner) cutting anything more will only be meaningful if everybody does it. But as I said below, you can only lead effectively from the front.

Thank you for the info graphics.
Without negative emissions (taking green house gases out of atmosphere), we are still in trouble, but reducing emissions is better than not doing it!

I have only energy saving light bulbs, I tuned my hot water so it is only luke warm, I keep my AC at 80 degrees and I am a Vegan. I'm thinking about buying an electric car this December.

It's going to take a lot of different measures to overcome the climate crisis.

We also should stop buying cheap stuff online, anybody ever thought how much airpollution all that " shipping and handling " produces ? Things that we realy need should be produced closer to home, as much as possible. And consumers should be willing to pay the price.
Also , leave your car at home, take the bus , walk, ride a bicycle.
Nice btw, that we are allowed to keep our current kids .

The Paris climate agreement is stupid as it gives China and India a pass. One of the big reason for reduced carbon in the US is increased use of clean burning natural gas.

Not sure why the Admin uses India as an example that they are doing more than those of us who have actually reduced significantly our carbon footprint. Or if non-believers are better at it than religious people. That is just a ridiculous question given the fact that the majority of people in this planet follow some kind of religion, just India has about 1.4 billion people the overwhelming majority of them religious, while the whole world has only 1.1 billion non believers, out of almost 8 billion in tbe world. Simple math indicates this "concern" is bogus. But returning to the India case, they just set a target a couple of days ago to reduce its carbon footprint by 35%, a target nobody believes they can get closer to due to their completely lackluster performance to date. And definitely not to be set as an example to anyone. Not sure the reasons behind the Admin's disdain for those of us who are doing their part and saying so, perhaps because we just are, and say that India is doing more. Absurd. [downtoearth.org.in]

There are some bad worded alternatives here. I do all these things already, some by default due to age or having certain issues like retirement, income, etcetera. I drive a hybrid, consume sustainable beef only, have a tankless water heater, a/c consumption low using programmable thermostat during hours of operation despite living in Florida, no heat at all because of south Florida, live in energy efficient condo bought after selling a huge colonial home in Milton, MA. I fly overseas once a year round trip, and usually drive when going places within the USA or use train if long hauls. So I really doubt I can reduce it even more than what I am already doing.