Why was the popular vote so close in the US presidential election?
Regardless of the eventual winner, one thing that stood out was how close the popular vote was. What does it imply that the polls, predicting a Biden win with up to 10% more votes, were wrong. Why were many voters afraid to tell even an anonymous pollster that they preferred Trump over Biden?
What we choose to believe the reason to be greatly impacts how we, as a country, proceed.
-
We could choose to believe that the Trump supporters are simply closet racists, sexists, and bigots who secretly want to support one of their own - doing so reaffirms the narrative that America is a terrible place.
-
Or, we could choose that they were not buying the narrative that America is fundamentally flawed with racism, sexism, and other forms of bigotry .
-
Or, we could choose that they simply believed that Trump was a better choice despite the best efforts of mainstream news, social media, and the entertainment industry to highlight his flaws - factual or not.
Especially for Biden/Harris supporters, how to move forward really depends on what was learned from this election. If it's the first option, perhaps Trump supporters simply need more CRT (aka, racial sensitivity) and similar training? If it's the second, perhaps it's a time to re-examine some of the assumptions of the progressive movement? If it's the third, perhaps these organizations should try harder?
What do you think?
6
Enjoy being online again!
Welcome to the community of good people who base their values on evidence and appreciate civil discourse - the social network you will enjoy.Create your free account
37 comments
Feel free to reply to any comment by clicking the "Reply" button.
Jim Wright
So, what have you learned?
I mean, you should have known this already, but it's obvious many of you didn't.
So, what have you learned?
I'll tell you: people lie.
That's what you learned.
"Decent" Conservatives are embarrassed to vote for Trump.
They are (and note the quote marks before you reach for the keyboard).
Decent Republicans, or at least those who think of themselves as such, they're embarrassed by Trump.
They're embarrassed to see what's become of their political party, their ideology, the so-called Party of Lincoln.
They're embarrassed to see the hate, the racism, the bigotry, the sexism, the nationalism, the Swastikas and the Confederate flags and all the things that so much resemble 1930's Germany -- oh, I don't mean they're embarrassed by those things themselves, I mean they're embarrassed to see Trump waving it around out in the open.
See, so long as they keep their white sheets hidden away in the closet and they're not actually burning crosses in a black family's front yard or shoveling Jews into the ovens, they can pretend they're not horrible people.
They can pretend they really ARE living up to those ideals their religion tells them are the ticket to some better afterlife.
And there's Trump, reminding them everyday who they really are.
Rubbing their noses in it.
Some, well, they embrace it. They mount flags on their trucks and shout it from the windows. They'll be the first ones in line when the job of Concentration Camp Guard opens up.
But many? Maybe even most?
They're embarrassed.
So, when the pollsters call, they lie about who they're going to vote for.
Trump? I just can't. I'm a republican, but I'm voting for Joe!
And we wanted to believe them.
We wanted to believe our neighbors and our countrymen really WEREN'T a bunch of fucking Nazis.
But when no one can see, when they're all alone in the voting booth, then they cast their ballot for hate, fear, bigotry, and more Trump, because secretly, that's who they ARE.
That's who they really are.
Larimar
Level 8
Nov 5, 2020
8
Pollsters are polling the wrong people or not polling the right people. In this era without landlines or print media, people blocking all anonymous calls, they may not be able to gauge the vote accurately. I think some of the vote isn't out yet and some of it may have been suppressed. The polls were off. We will see just how far off when the final tally is in. They may have gotten the winning POTUS right, we shall see. They got the actual numbers wrong, there is no doubt about that.
barjoe
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
5
You reveal your bias and its underlying White Privilege by not listing Voter Suppression as a choice when that has been repeatedly documented.
Krish55
Level 8
Nov 5, 2020
3
@Admin "Something Else" is not adequate for such a major, demonstrated cause.
- USPS Deliberately Sabotaged: resulting in 7% of mail-in votes (overwhelmingly Democratic) not delivered.
- Polling Stations Closed in Minority Areas: resulting in resulting in prohibitively long lines for working-class folks with tiring jobs that don't offer time off.
- Florida GOP Legislators Preventing Ex-Felons from Voting: in violation of the recent state constitutional amendment permitting that. The history of the underlying Southern laws dating from the post-Civil war era disenfranchising felons show a racist intent to prevent blacks from voting by arbitrary arrests and sentencing in racist courts. A practice that continues...
You assume way too much from the omission.
@Krish55 Trump has gotten one hell of a lot of Hispanic and black votes though. Based on what Biden said on national TV; that would make them not black.
Because sheep have to follow no matter the shepherd. It's all they know.
Leelu
Level 7
Nov 5, 2020
3
Real true!!
IMO, The U.S. population, as in the Trumppets, has dumbed down so far and deeply that it supports stupidity, racism, misogyny, tyranny, nepotism, etc, etc completely.
Triphid
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
4
Yes, I have progressed beyond all the socio economic political psychological analytical babble about why Trump supporters fervently support a would be dictator, and Ive left it behind. Bottom line: half of America wants an Autocratic America, because it appeals to them -- until it affects them personally, of course. American capitalism and their news and entertainment industry have dumbed down half the country (to use your term) and this is what we see.
Popular vote as of now stands at 72.8 million for Biden and 69.2 million for Trump, Biden has received more votes than any candidate in history, even more than Obama and is almost 1 million more popular votes than Trump vs Hillary which was basically 3 million. This said, the electoral college is planned to make elections close and that is why we have to wait. The split is basically 52 to 48. Trump voters are mostly made of people who are highly suceptible of being influenced by disinformation and fear of things they don't really know or understand, a large majority of them are either racist or xenophobic or both, many are mysoginists, ignorant and irrational. Your choices are improperly phrased, reread them, for example, if you are a Trump supporter wouldn't this also mean that you are convinced he is the better choice? Why support him if not? What narrative in the Biden platform mentions that America "is fundamentally flawed"? None. There is systemic racism that must change, there are many policies that must be improved or actualized, like the electoral college or the lifetime appointments, quite a stretch from this to implying that Biden espoused a platform of saying that we live in a "fundamentally flawed America." Quite the opposite. Biden's message was always that united we can achieve anything we want. Oh, and while there are many "closeted" bigots as you describe them, there are many more openly racist bigots. The count is not over and the analysis of the demographics hasn't even started.
Mofo1953
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
4
Because the average IQ of the American Citizen is 100. This means that all the Trump supporters can have double digit IQ's, which goes a long way toward answering your question.
Normanbites
Level 7
Nov 5, 2020
4
I'm sure most of them think he's the better choice, I doubt they are introspective enough to know why they think that.
Willow_Wisp
Level 8
Nov 5, 2020
4
The most important issue to most people is a strong economy, and before COVID it was perceived by many that Trump deserved credit for it. Now we need a rebound and they aren't convinced Biden could lead it. IMO.
KevinMR
Level 7
Nov 5, 2020
4
OMG so true, Obama and Biden set up the economy so well that Trump could claim ownership until he screwed it all up by lying about the dangers of the pandemic. It was NEVER Trumps economy, it was and remains Obamas.
Borrowing money to give tax breaks is going to give a boost to the economy as that money is spent but it is detrimental in the long term. Unemployment had reduced slightly under Trump until Covid struck but they would probably be mostly zero hour contracts in retail and the service industries.
Think that says neither of them are popular regardless of what their respective parties would have you believe...
SpikeTalon
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
2
Trump loves em stupid....and they haven't disappointed.....he speaks and hates at their level.
Redneckliberal
Level 7
Nov 5, 2020
3
Part of the problem is that the US operates on a 2 party system for practical purposes, almost all other Western Democracies have more than 2 parties but the US has never really managed more than 2 serious parties. People were left with 3 choices, vote for a fascist, vote for another old, white dude who is long past his prime or vote for a fringe party like the Libertarians or the Greens. Given the available options, combined with the pandemic and the economic uncertainty, it's not so surprising that it is a close race.
People want equality and decency for the most part but when it comes to opening their wallet and paying for it then it's not so straightforward for a lot of people.
Surfpirate
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
2
As this is an atheist site, I think I should point out that religion teaches people to only pay attention to the facts that fit the narrative of what they want to believe. I think this is a primary influence as to why so many peopel voted for Trump.
Add in the closet racists and bigots, and also "celebrity worship", and between all three you have covered almost everybody who voted for him.
snytiger6
Level 9
Nov 6, 2020
2
All democracies become split down the middle. Because each side coming from one direction, tries to grab as much of the demographic as it can, by appealing to the centre but starts to loose support from its loud outer fringe as it moves into the centre. Forcing a state of balanced halves, with no room for third opinions.
That means that it is almost inevitable that in all democracies, the majority in the centre of the political bell curve, are forced into choosing the lesser of two evils all the time. Perhaps that is a good thing, since it helps to stop apathy. But it can also lead to dangerous swing politics, where any movement towards the extreme by one side is seen as an invitation and compulsion, to become more extreme by the other, the swings often becoming deeper and more reactive over time, until constant changes of policy from one extreme to the other begin to damage the states institutions.
I remember reading many years ago, the naturalist Konrad Lorenz. Who lived through the nineteen thirties in Germany. Proposing that this was observable in German politics before the collapse of the main parties, admitting the then tiny Nazi party in, to make a grab for power.
Some people hold that well designed electoral systems, based on things like proportional representation could prevent political division and swing politics, but of course that is at the cost of apathy and possible corruption, by entrenched political castes.
Fernapple
Level 9
Nov 6, 2020
3
Swing politics also leads to inefficiencies. Each new administration winds up undoing things from the last or creating new measures to counter what the previous admin has put into place.
@itsmedammit Yes, that is mainly what I meant by "damages institutions". Though trying to keep it short, I had to use that difficult phrase and could not put it so well as you do.
Everybody is racist.
That's why we need a government.
Storm1752
Level 8
Nov 5, 2020
2
That’s what Trump revealed.
Strangely we had time today at my workplace to discuss some of this in a civil way. I found it amusing that when I said Trump wanted the counting stopped when he saw he was losing, a couple of co-workers said with a straight face that he wanted counting stopped as he was winning. As if that would make any difference at all. I was quick to point out to those who claimed Trump won that he only had 214 electoral votes. That isn't winning. Then one man wanted to know why there was so much counting and no answers would satisfy him. He claimed that Mexicans and other illegals would be voting before it's over just to get the numbers up.
Now read that again and even try reading between the lines and you will find out what is wrong with Trump supporters. In short, they simply believe what they want to believe. I get it that everyone is angry and both parties need to fix this. It was all of this anger that got Trump elected. What his supporters got was false hope. I think they were tired of lies out of DC.
DenoPenno
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
2
There is about a 4,000,000 difference between Biden and Trump at the moment. I don't think that is "so close".
Alienbeing
Level 8
Nov 6, 2020
2
Those were double digit PERCENT difference predictions. There is currently only a 2.8% difference...
We are still fighting the Civil War. Just not with some folks favorite tool, armaments. The "right" won this election just not the Executive Branch. Republicans keep the Senate, increase the House, not one Republican Assembly overturned, & we are as divided as ever. But it looks like rural vs urban. I am not happy. But then I rarely am. Pay some taxes Amazon!!! =0{
Mooolah
Level 8
Nov 6, 2020
2
Throughout history polls, or Poles as Trump called them in a tweet, although I don't see what central Europeans have to do with it, have often been wrong. Why ?. Possibly because some people deliberately try to give a false impression or are embarrassed at revealing their choice of candidate, as may be the case with some Trump supporters.
Moravian
Level 8
Nov 6, 2020
1
A very good question and I am sure many are wondering about it.
Here are my thoughts:
- Russia is manipulating the voting machines although Trump's government officials would not admit it because it is benefiting their candidate,
- This is more likely because how is it that mail in ballots favor Biden while machine votes favor Trump? Is that just a coincidence? OR
- The conservatives truly came out in high numbers on the election day and the Republican Party said that registered 8 million new voters in the rural area in the battleground states who never voted before. If this is true, Republicans again have caught Democrats flat footed like they did in 2016.
How is it possible that now two elections in a row that the actual results come out entirely in contrast to all opinion polls?
The sudden wins are only happening to the Republicans! I can understand polling margin errors but Sarah Gideon in Maine who was consistently ahead of Susan Collins suddenly loses by 12% points? Cunningham in NC consistently ahead by a lot first but now is losing to Perdue?
I am leaning towards election meddling most likely by Russia. No other country other than China has the technological ability and China does not love Trump. Russia has been choosing candidates in all Baltic, Central American countries and it is reported that it is doing it in India. No matter what opinion polls say in India, no matter how how much the prime minister is hated or disliked or is unpopular.. he always seems to get a thumping majority every time and everywhere.
St-Sinner
Level 9
Nov 5, 2020
1
I just read something about huawei voting machines being in Q in other country. Do we have those in use anywhere in US?
Okay here we go. American voters should NOT be happy about this. [securityledger.com] This type of equipment, given the high level of importance, doesn't anyone see this is problematic?
@Flowerwall Not sure of the name of voting machines in my area, but the machine takes the paper ballot and a person standing at the machine watches the counter on the machine as it does so. As for a machine being Chinese in any way, or having Chinese hardware, I imagine all of them could have this. Nothing is made in America and nobody is likely to change that fact.
@DenoPenno Well it sounds okay, the machine you described, but there are so many things that go wring with tech being hacked, who knows. I started reading more today on how this issue relates back to constitution and states' rights, but really in todays day and age, big problem. For instance machines that go online for even short time pose security risk. Well WI has that and if I read correctly MI recently added, though all states were going in opposite direction of doing away with online access. So why MI added, big Q.
"Nothing is made in America and nobody is likely to change that fact" This is problematic. Is it lack of being important, or ppl not viewing it this way? No, it's just not getting done, needs to change. It's a big biz oppurtunity too, isn't it? Gov contracts are big $. I mean really you would have thought where there's $ to be made, Americans would be making it. That's what Americans DO.
@Flowerwall The big problem today is that Americans are making money but to cut costs to manufacturing they are not in this country. Nothing or nobody can change that.
@DenoPenno Yes I understand that. But if you did produce a machine with all American made components, even if cost was much higher, it would have a selling point other machines would not. I would think it would be the only choice. I could picture every election entity in US would buy!
Also it looks like a lot of changes went into effect with " the $3.9 billion in federal funding provided by the Help America Vote Act in 2002, the computerized voting machine came of age." I think this was not as progressive a move as it appears on the surface as it opens the voting process up to all sorts of problems, including hacking. The fact that we made this move and still now 20 years later have concerns about hacking of voting machines, have had it proved these machines can indeed be hacked, shows the move was highly premature, ill-prepared and not a good choice afterall in that it left our election process vulnerable for quite some years. Wouldn't a better system involve immeciately processing ballots via an analog system with voter still present in order to verify it's validity while still maintaining its' anominity? Why go digital?
@Flowerwall Analog and digital is not the problem. Go back to G W Bush and we had issues yet of "hanging chad" with ballots. That's not so long ago. In my area we have paper ballots marked with a black sharpie and fed into a machine that counts the ballots. At some point election officials have to hand count these ballots. Your voter fraud issues would sound more like something digital in a movie plot issue, but fraud is always possible in some way. All I know for sure is that Jose and Maria are not coming across our borders to vote in our elections. Busloads of voters were never showing up. Ignorant people want to believe otherwise and this is why we are having controversy over the counting process going on right now.
@DenoPenno Having the innards of our digital voting machines made in China and Russia makes about as much sense as sending the ballots to those two nations to be tabulated. You understand?
"Analog and digital is not the problem. " Maybe not in your opinion. It is in mine. I prefer non-digital means for diffetent aspects of our society. I think the fact that everyone is content with being controlled with tech shows how we are all prone to accepting the role of sheep.
Who are Jose and Maria? What busload of voters?
"At some point election officials have to hand count these ballots. " That's okay with me as long as it's being counted accurately.
Additionally your complete rejection of the obvious misstep our country made in introducing technology before we were fully prepared and or even aware of the drawbacks makes me doubt your commitment to an honest assessment of what has really transpired here.
@St-Sinner What does that mean? Is it an attempt to discredit everything I just said because I prefer Trump this vote?
It means somebody is manipulating the voting machines. How is it possible that all swing states are allowing Trump to win without mail in ballots? Secondly, how can Trump be ahead by 615,000 votes in Pennsylvania first and the mail ballots wipe out all that lead? Is it Russia? Who is doing this?
How can an unpopular president get elected during a bad of job in the pandemic and a collapsing economy?
@St-Sinner It's probably some ballot harvesting too. Don't forget that video clip of man with more ballots in his possession than legally allowed during earlier election this year. It was a documented violation that nothing was done about. Ballot harvesting seems completely inappropriate in my mind. Do you really think the solicitor of ballots is exerting no control of voters actions? And I don't care which candidate you are voting for.
Also, I find the fact that in some places all mail in ballots are for Biden highly suspect. Surely SOME voted Trump by mail.
"all swing states are allowing Trump to win without mail in ballots" what specific examples r u talking about? These are swing states - Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Maine, Michigan, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Wisconsin.
In some places support for Trump was very high, 5 to 1.
As far as him being a failing Pres. What do we get now? Shell out more to gov to pay for all the destruction caused by riots and lack of basic gov standards in the first place that caused it. How about we spend $100 bil more and still not know how to not import a communicable disease that originates in a foreign nation. And don't worry there will be less police to protect too! But somehow it's all being done for betterment of society.
@Flowerwall I'm so sorry that technology came way before we were ready for it. What date would you suggest for it then? You want the ballots counted accurately. I suppose they were while Trump was winning. At what point did the tables turn and did other ballot counters take over then? Hard to believe that you haven't heard of busloads of Mexicans voting here illegally. That's where "Jose and Maria' come in, and it never happened. You doubt my concern to a commitment of an honest assessment of what's happening here. OK. You got your wish. Now let's let all of Trump's people oversee this, count the ballots, and tell us who really won.
I'm done. No more from me to you on the subject. You can believe this is all a ride at Disneyland if you want to. Some of us know better and do not get into angry distractions. Trump won so you can be happy now. Goodbye.
The polls were equally wrong regarding Republicans other than Trump. Susan Collins was supposed to lose. Thom Tillis was supposed to lose. David Perdue was supposed to lose. So there is something going on other than Donald Trump and his personal psychological relationship to voters.
editor20
Level 6
Nov 6, 2020
1
Polls rely on people to voluntarily comply to give information to the pollster. Trump supporters tend to not trust government, and they tend to not trust pollsters. Then there is the "busy factor". I received multiple calls from pollsters while I was working, and I just hung up the phone. A retired grandmother who sits home watching CNN all day listening to anti-Trump propaganda is more likely to spend the time talking to the pollster about her opinions than someone like me who is running 2 businesses.
BD66
Level 8
Nov 6, 2020
1
