Here's the difference between fake news and real news. I often post articles from The Intercept. So a fair warning. The Intercept was bought out by a British company a while back and now tends to throw in an establishment project occasionally. If you have happened to save this site from my coverage here on them, take note! Common Dreams can occasionally do the same thing. They have 1 or 2 writers using their site that often get called out by the members there also. I've been following Common Dreams for over a decade. I often learn a lot by reading comments in the members area of articles. And Common Dreams has one of the best comments sections I know of! I highly suggest when you read articles on your favorite news sites, enjoy the comments also, even if you don't get into posting! The members have a lot to offer and other links to help develop an opinion on the good sites. Ok, onward.

This, I say this very lightly, article, from The Intercept writer goes into the recent indictment of 12 Russians. It's short and sweet, provides no freaking substance or evidence. Same as the indictment itself!

A SWING-STATE ELECTION VENDOR REPEATEDLY DENIED BEING HACKED BY RUSSIANS. THE NEW MUELLER INDICTMENT SAYS OTHERWISE.

[theintercept.com]

You could see how someone could walk away from this article believing we now have proof of the Russians having hacked the DNC. Fake news!

From one of my most trusted sources. Real investigative journalism on the other hand as follows. With a truly complete detailed article. Take special notice of reaction from Mueller when the accused actually show up to court!

Evidence Will Probably Never Be Produced in Indictments of ‘Russian Agents’

[consortiumnews.com]