New House Documents Sow Further Doubt That Russia Hacked the DNC

For two and a half years the House Intelligence Committee knew CrowdStrike didn’t have the goods on Russia. Now the public knows too.

[consortiumnews.com]

Ray McGovern, for those new/ish to the group, is a member of the Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity he mentions, along with William Binney---- [en.wikipedia.org]
mentioned in the article. Along with several other people with ranging backgrounds from X military, X intelligence agents, computer, data, and intelligence analysis. Hence the title Special to Consortium News. This group was welcomed to Consortium News by the founder of the first Internet news source Robert Parry. [consortiumnews.com]

Now the public knows too. !?! But do they really? The better question may be, do they really get it? Understand it? Prepared to accept it and act on it? It's early yet, but the only MSCM I've seen remotely covering this more than 3 year debacle is Fox news with an interview of Lindsey Graham. And it fails to mention the DNC arena of the Mueller investigation. I've been going around the block with this one from the start over 3 years ago as I and many in this group recognized the con job being pulled by the entire democratic party, both parties for that matter, MSCM, and the intelligence community working on behalf of Clinton. Now it's going to be used yet again as a distraction to again make the republicans look like the adults of the illusion. Maybe, just maybe, the public will actually take the worth of information coming out yet again like those of us who seen the entire picture over 3 years ago. As it raises as many questions as it answers to lead a sensible person towards the possibility of both parties, via MSCM, being in collaboration of manufacturing false narratives for an agenda.

I will not go into length on the data aspect like I usually do on these articles. McGovern does a good job of that this time in this article. But one thing he did leave out this time was that of the data transfer rate. As analysis of the DNC data base was examined it was determined that the extraction rate was to quick to have been a hack (over the Internet) As McGovern points out, this would obviously lead the NSA to a trail also being they capture all electronic movement over the Internet. So it's highly more probable that the data was copied onto a memory device.

{The intelligence-friendly corporate media, nonetheless, immediately awarded the status of Holy Writ to the misnomered “Intelligence Community Assessment” (it was a rump effort prepared by “handpicked analysts” from only CIA, FBI, and NSA), and chose to overlook the banal, full-disclosure-type caveats embedded in the assessment itself.}

Note: not all 17 intelligence agencies that were constantly on repetitive mode by MSCM and especially Clinton and her collaborators. I still hear that false narrative occasionally.

{On Jan. 18, 2017, at his final press conference, Obama saw fit to use lawyerly language on the key issue of how the DNC emails got to WikiLeaks, in an apparent effort to cover his own derriere.

Obama: “The conclusions of the intelligence community with respect to the Russian hacking were not conclusive as to whether WikiLeaks was witting or not in being the conduit through which we heard about the DNC e-mails that were leaked.”}

In other words. Obama mentioning 'hacking' purposely permitted the continuance of a false narrative, then with mentioning 'leaked' covered his own ass on the way out the door.