After being dropped from their app stores by Google and Apple after the Capital protests, hosting provider Amazon announced yesterday that they will be removing free-speech site Parler from the Internet today alleging violent content.
Parler, a communication platform for many Trump supporters, had grown 10x since the US election to the 216th largest US website as of yesterday.
A Trump supporter may ask: Was this action warranted? Is there a double standard being played out for Trump and BLM/ANTIFA/Biden supporters? Do Big Tech platforms like Google, Amazon, and Apple, with a near-monopoly on online communication, have any obligation to be politically agnostic? How is their control of 99.9% of communication apps different from China's government control of communication and dissent?
Note: I personally respect both sides of the debate regarding this event. In the name of fighting what they see as injustice, it seems like both sides have members who cross the free speech line. It is also natural to see the opposite side as more threatening than ones own.
Are such actions morally right? Maybe not.
Is it legal? Absolutely.
This is just my opinion, but the real issue here is one of morality and not necessarily 1A. Platforms like Twitter and Facebook reserve the right to run their platforms as they see fit, and I reserve the right to totally ignore them in favor of a less-restrictive platform. So to me that is more a direct issue of morality than one of First Amendment rights.
Morality ??? Really spike ?? There is a morality issue on this ??
@Pralina1 Yes. Is it moral to ban someone for expressing views that some may perceive to be "hate speech"? That's the real question that should be asked. I certainly don't think it's a First Amendment issue here. With that said, personally I don't care either way, the amount of time those on the left and right are wasting on that topic is anything short of appalling to me. If I ever feel slighted by a social media platform, I simply delete my account and move on to another, just don't see the sense in complaining about it.
This is a better morality issue
@SpikeTalon they did not express views . They expressed gasoline on a fire , and rallied the less fortunate brain ways to do their dirty job . In high hopes that trump can remain in power . And therefore , no prison .
Nobody wants that blood on their hands . Or that Shame . It’s simple .
When nfl and nba players took a knee , I did not see any motherf of the right standing w them . 0 .
They were calling for their heads , they were calling to be banned from PRIVATE organizations , bcz “ unpatriotic “. My ass . But whatever . I dident see anyone going out saying , that’s private buisness , that’s immoral , or any as such .
@Pralina1 In reality, no one has a right to either. Twitter may be free to use, but you have to deal with ads then. As for healthcare, that's considered a service, a paid-for service that is. I have a chronic condition that at times can be costly to maintain, but that is my problem though and no else should have to pay for my problem(s). That's called self-responsibility. Affordable healthcare is another topic altogether, and neither the Democrats or Republicans have done much about that issue.
@SpikeTalon man . Insulin is expensive . Testing is expensive . Keeping up w precaution tests and checks is expensive .
Shouldn’t be only YOUR PROBLEM . Should be mine too .
If u can’t afford your insulin , shit happens u know , u can have two f jobs and two kids that suck your blood and money let’s say , and if u can’t afford your care , it’s my problem too .
I don’t want u to drive and have a hypo episode and kill self or anyone ! I want my taxes to go where is important and in good use . Health services for all humans is not a damn priveledge . Should be a right ! Man . I am gonna stop . That’s so sad .
@Pralina1 I'm not taking sides there, and I have openly condemned the riots at the Capitol on January sixth, as well as the rioting last summer connected to ANTIFA and BLM. What you mentioned in your last comment to me equates to a form of bias, depending on what political side you favor you will probably be inclined to take sides against the one you do not generally side with. I think both extremes are absurd and only helping to further the divide more. Regarding some athletes kneeling before sporting events, keep in mind the people who paid for tickets to said events did so with the intent on actually watching sports and not someone making a political statement, keep sports and politics separate. Of course, being I don't care for sports much, that whole debacle over athletes taking a knee didn't concern me much, I largely ignored that.
@Pralina1 You said the obvious, I know how expensive such medications and supplies are. Affordable care and a right to healthcare are two different things, and neither major political party has done much of anything to make healthcare more affordable. If you truly believe healthcare is a right, then I truly hope you are not making any money off of what you do for a living then? If the goal is to make healthcare an actual right, then we need to start with the doctors and nurses and other healthcare practitioners, they should all offer their services free of charge then. You and I both know however that will not be the case anytime soon, and you along with all the other healthcare providers should be compensated for your time and effort. Instead of focusing on making it a right, the focus should be on making it more affordable, as once it's affordable to all then making it a right would not be as important. The cost is the issue there, and not whether it should be a right or not.
@SpikeTalon I can take a pay cut if that means my country will provide affordable health care for all .
Doctors , I don’t know . They went to school for 10 yrs , I went for 6. Most ER hospitalist will work 10 yrs to pay off student loans . R u throwing free education to it ?
Nobody works for free spike . No doctor in countries that national health care is in place works for free . Don’t have to .
We are not barking to take your money . We r barking to make insurance an option , not the only option .
Your government should provide u w the basics plus preventive care and check ups for free / low cost . Nobody should worry if they can stretch their bp meds one more month bcz of cost . That’s how strokes happen .
And guess who is eating that stroke Bill at the end .
Nobody should see blood in the toilet and fear the cost / copayment of colonoscopy . Man . Really .
Who cares if we have stations at space ... healthy citizens are productive citizens and happy citizens .
If my taxes can’t support health and education for all , then I don’t know y I am paying taxes
Let me go . We had that argument b4 u and I . It doesn’t matter .
I made a lot of money spike this year . Too much it’s embarrassing . Disease sells . Who knew . U know y ? There are no critical care nurses left . U know y? Total cost for a bsn and a ms , up to 75k on these days I was told by the youngest . Nobody got that money or want to be on debt .
We have no doctors and we have no nurses . Be greatful that the patels and the Ramirez , and the Hassans , and the fratellis are still coming in this country to escape their nightmares , and go to med schools and nursing schools .
Occationally the blacks who were able to get an associates and work the rest online . Those are the majority of your nurses and docs today .
I am done . Stay healthy . Eat right . Diabetes is not a joke . Check your feet daily . Your eyes twice a year . Take your meds . Keep snacks ALWAYS and everywhere around u .
Peace out
@Pralina1 I don't expect anyone to work for free, and that was my point, making healthcare an actual right will not solve the problem, the focus should be shifted to finding ways to make healthcare more affordable for all. I'm not opposed to a Government funded health plan, just so long as such a plan remains a choice and is not forced on anyone. On the taxes part, maybe we need to come up with a more viable solution to the problem than just more taxes? Apparently, the system in place currently is not doing not enough (system meaning taxpayer funded programs, people are still suffering despite the social welfare programs already in place). If you think you made too much money for just doing your job that you are embarrassed by it, then maybe ask for a pay cut from your boss? If you aren't willing to do that, then I'm not quite convinced you are embarrassed from it.
We have no Doctors and nurses you say? That sure isn't the case near me, my local health network has a load of healthcare professionals that work in a huge medical complex. Becoming a physician usually means making a decent living, so I'm not too worried about there being a lack of those going into that field, and those coming from other countries to be physicians do so as they know where the money is at.
Okie dokie, thanks and take care.
@Pralina1 One quick question...
A few years back I was active on a chat forum called FireChat, and once did a post explaining why I thought abortion procedures should be kept legal in the US, and that post got me suspended for three days. Nothing vile in said post, I merely offered points as to why abortion should always be legal, and it got me suspended. So my question is, do you think I was being a "dick" just for trying to make rational points for keeping abortion legal and that I deserved to get suspended? If your answer be no, then I'd say that your claim above that those who get censored on social media do so for being dicks is not always the case, sometimes someone may get censored unjustly, and I think that's the core of the problem when it comes to the social media censorship debate.
@SpikeTalon u shared your opinion about abortions . U did not rally people to go get one . U did not make them believe that if they don’t get one , horrible things will happen to them and their country . That’s that .
We have nurses . We don’t have high tech / critical care nurses . Big difference .
Convincing nobody , not the goal . It is quiet embarrassing for some of us who worked w a new disease to know that we made a lots of $$$ while r favorite restaurants lost their jobs , r favorite local spots closed for ever , and r grocery store workers made no money more than usual but were exposed daily to same possibilities as we . And no gear / suits for them .
I don’t have a boss . I work for my self under the hospital umbrella / policies . I don’t have to work more than 8 shifts a month if I don’t want to . I can stay home . I did and I do bcz is the right thing to do on time of crisis . There were no extra money . ( as they shouldn’t ). There is 80 hrs a week , every week bcz of great need and not enough nurses to manage vents etc . Labor law have to pay me overtime . Getting my body to work every day was my law . My decision .
@Pralina1 So in other words you think it was wrong of FireChat to censor me then?
@SpikeTalon yes .
In other news , I just finished reading same post at slug , all comments , then I ventured to research Parler and minds and owners and ceos . Parler ceo is for the birds .
I stoped after reading his efforts to promote no masking w covid . I am done . U won’t understand a word I am saying . And that’s fine .
@Pralina1 Good to hear you think that was wrong of FireChat to censor me like that, and I can assure you that I did not push women to get abortions, only tried to make a case for why such procedures should be kept legal was all.
Thought you said you could not access SLUG due to a firewall or something? You make an account on there or just browse the site? Personally I do not care for alternative sites like Parler or GAB, too many whack jobs on those platforms. I do like Minds though, as the creators of Minds are working on allowing content creators to monetize their efforts, and I have contributed cyber security/technology etc posts on there that received quite a bit of feedback from fellow members. It's not just about politics on Minds, and I like that.
@SpikeTalon I couldn’t access at work . I can access from home on my phone . I do not have accounts . Trolling , no time for that . Same reason I don’t have accounts on christian loving sites . What’s the point . I am not a Christian and I am not a conservative .
I have nothing else to say in the future on this admins posts .
I ve seen all I need to see . I do wonder AGAIN at this point , y he maintains this site here , a site full of people like me , and once again I ll have to evaluate how safe I am here .
As many on the right like to point out (when it comes to baking cakes and holding events for those they deem as less than themselves, etc.), private companies can do whatever they please.
All these tech companies have Terms of Service "contracts" that everyone who uses their platforms agree to abide by.
No one is forced to utilize their social media platforms.
The companies get to reject anything they find that goes against their terms.
Parler is currently being used by those who are parroting lies, and encouraging violence.
If other companies don't want to carry the site, that's their prerogative.
The First Amendment is very clear about Free Speech. The government is not permitted to retaliate against any citizen who speaks against it.
Private companies are not held to the same standards.
Subsequent court cases have reiterated that fact.
Which is why people can lose their jobs if they say things or act in any way their employers find objectionable.
Most states are "At Will", and employers can basically terminate employment at any time, for any reason.
There are an awful lot of laws on the books which would have to be changed before anyone can take action against any tech company for perceived free speech violations.
I'm not saying some of those laws shouldn't be challenged, but there are no short cuts here.
What we say, what we do, it all has consequences.
In the case of Parler, if you (general you)
don't like it, too fucking bad.
Better late than never. There is no "free speech line" for corporations. There is only the bottom line. So they do what they do to keep from offending their customers. So in that way... their action was very democratic. If the general public had been fine with a dictator wannabe directing a mob to overthrow an election, the corporations would not have pulled the plug.
Note: I do not personally respect both sides of the debate regarding this event. I respect only the side that is based in reality, democracy, and the rule of law. Catering to mass hysteria, and unhinged conspiracy theories is not protecting free speech - it is protecting self-destruction. Accurate perception and paranoid delusion do not deserve equal consideration. Just because both sides think they're right doesn't mean they are. The citizens have voted at the polls, and public opinion has voted in the market.
This
Why not ask Rupert Murdoch this question as well?
Why not ask ALL forms of Media this question since they also, by means of their forms of media, have some sort of control over what we see, hear, read, etc, etc.
Small dogs always seem to think that they are BIGGER dogs and act so, Bigger Dogs seem to think they ARE the Paramount of Dogs, that is similar to how, imo, these Media Moguls see themselves and WILL continue to do so UNLESS they ARE reined in.
Parler, imo, and based upon what I have seen, read and heard has been acting as a kind of Pro-tRump Propaganda Site/Group bent, somewhat, upon promoting Insurrection, etc, simply because it cannot encompass/embrace the truth that tRump has lost the Podium and the Election.
Ergo, I say Well Done to those who deemed Parler well and truly worthy of being given the 'boot.'
What is the problem ?
Private company Amazon , they can chose who to host and who is aloud to operate under their name .
Apparently some companies decided to take the garbage out .
Your problem seems to be that : a) this is not garbage .
B) poor trump supporters , where will find a place to misinform , hate , conspire .
Are there any web sites that aloud killers to talk about the glory of murder , or pedophiles “ 101 tips how to lure kids ?” I wonder . They have rights too damn it ! Is free speech , y are not heard ???
Well . Is Fox News still alive and well ?
Is Alex Jones still in buisness ? What about All the Christian evangelicals shows and sites ?
I am sure slug can help them out ?
The irony , when tick tock was a problem
@Admin well . I am sure big companies are not out there having as # 1 priority how to protect or inform people . Nah . Money talks . First , and always .
What ve learned in this election is that 70 plus millions of humans in this country still thinks that trump walks on water , or , he might not , but at least he serves their rest of their agenda well . Sure and no doubt , priorities here !
Point is , in my little non buisness head , do u think Amazon wants to lose money ( and other perks ) from 70 million humans without reason ? Do u think ceo woke up one day and gave a damn about humanity , violence , misinformation ? No .
Simply the right has showing their buttocks too much and their colors too much , to the point that not taking a stand or been silent or allowing them grounds to continue puts your company in the shit bucket . Identify w garbage , allowing garbage to smell in your house , makes u look like garbage too .
And I am pretty sure they took that decision not as agnostics of this topic . I am sure they have what they need to justify .
That’s my opinion . No research done of my behalf .
@Admin How can one be "agnostic' in regards to an event or ANY event for that matter since the meaning of the word 'agnostic' differs technically from the subject to which you have applied it?
One can be either "incensed, angered, irate, annoyed, etc, etc, or even ambivalent, unperturbed, etc, etc, in regards to an event/ events but, imo, the word 'agnostic' does not, technically and grammatically either fit in nor apply in this instance.
There is nothing moral or humane by been a dick .
On top of that , besides if intentionally blind , it’s dangerous . People died for not apparent reason .
Well , if u count as reasoning that orange asshole can’t accept election results , yeah ok , I see your point .
Y the media supported BLM ? Bcz believe it or not , killing black people for nothing is not ok .
R difference here is the basics : u ( whoever ), believes that it’s not ok to protest against racial crimes .
I believe is not ok to protest for the delusion that elections were stolen .
The guy that rallied all these idiots believes that is not ok for him to go to prison . Yeah , fight for his right to not go to prison , fight for his right remain the president .
Is that so hard to see ??
The companies who see it , took the garbage out . Fear that they will be associated w garbage .
At the very end , is always a place for it . I know at least few web pages that support them and give them space to be . Are we all ?
Firstly they are private companies so they can ban whomever they want. A free press is not encumbered by a newspaper refusing your advert or refusing to print your story for whatever reasons. Just as Chick-a-fil is free to donate to anti-LGBTQ then we are free not to shop there.
Is there a double standard? Notwithstanding the previous paragraph, the nature of social media and its algorithms leads people down their own rabbit holes. If Google stops the beginning of this spiral then I welcome it. The amount of misinformation and hate speech on these sites has to be an overriding factor, also their motives. I am not sure if Antifa or BLM would meet the low standards for this kind of ban?
"How is their control of 99.9% of communication apps different from China's government control of communication and dissent?"
That is conflating government with private corporations -- orange/apple (no pun intended)
@Admin ONE of them can put folks in jail.
are you worried about the freedom of speech of kiddie porn? If you agree that we have the right and the obligation to stop this, then this ties into terms of service for online servers.
Amazon is their web hosting service. The far right was complaining about Amazon for over four years, they are under no moral obligation to continue to provide web hosting services to Parler, just like Google and Apple is under no obligation to offer the app. This is NOT a free speech issue and for you to insinuate that it is shows that you do not understand the issue at all from a legal standpoint let alone a Constitutional standpoint.
I remember being a remote host for Q-Link and AOL way back in the 80's and 90's. I had a command that could block chat from users if they didn't follow TOS and after so many strikes they weren't allowed onto AOL anymore at all. No refunds. Those folks also attempted to say it inhibited their freedom of speech.....they didn't win anymore than you will with this.
This is a bit misleading by Admin. It was pulled due to the fact that Parler itself would not add moderation. Had Parler added fact checkers as well as term of service enforcement they wouldn't have been dropped.
Thank you! They broke the rules under which they had agreed.
Oh . Good to know . What a delightful and shitty surprise .
Wow !
@Admin and heres your evidence. Literally took me a minute and a half to find it.
Thank u . Wow .
Please describe how a private company deciding not to host another company's website after terms of service were violated is censorship again ?
How is that not simple capitalism?
@Pralina1 'reality' is two wolves and one sheep deciding on 'what's for dinner'
@Admin I don't won't ever use FB/twitter/WhatsApp
Like you starting Humanist/Agnostic/Slug forums, others can start their own platforms.
"decide what is acceptable speech" -- How do YOU feel about the possible changing of Section 230 ?
@Admin So I assume you are also perfectly comfortable with how a handful of media conglomerates own over 90% of all the mass media (newspapers, radio, and TV stations), which all have a pro-corporate, anti-labor, bias in favor of the ruling class and a clear hatred of any groups which are for economic equality? That kind of imbalance and monopoly are ok? Just checking.....Since they are all private companies, they can do what they want, etc. I am not ok with that status quo, but the only way it can be reformed is thru govt. regulation, which I doubt you are ok with, even tho I certainly am... We still have anti- trust laws on the books, it's just that with two corrupt, corporate-owned major parties, they never get enforced anymore....
If you want Parler it it still available and acessable here, [parler.com] no one has taken it off the internet some sites and corporations are just not linking to it
John Matze the ceo of parler has announced it could leave the site unavailable for up to a week while they change servers.
The term "fair" when it comes to big business, is so removed from any notion of fairness in the world you and i live in, that using the word seems meaningless
Please refer us to the authority that requires private companies to "play fair" with respect to policing online violence.
I know very little of Parlor and certainly would not use it. I'm not in favor of anything Trump and never was from the beginning. Trump and his supporters have brought this upon themselves because of January 6th. Even now certain ones want to doubt that Trump was responsible. Where have they been for the last 4 years?
@Admin Trump got more media coverage than any politician or personality in the history of media. Hardly a single day in the past 5 years went by, without Trump being on the news for some reason or other and I live in the UK.
I suggest you watch "Death to 2020" on Netflix. In it, a comic version of Kellyanne Conway played by Lisa Kudrow talks about how conservative voices are being silenced, "I've said it again and again how conservative voices are being silenced. I said on CNN, on ABC, Newsmax, I said it twice on fox and in my bestselling book "How conservative voices are being silenced".
@Admin There is no helping these people, it was trump himself who continuously lied to his supporters for the past four years and they believed him. It's his fault they feel the way they do. He needs to fix it but we all know he's not, I just see him making it worse, so that's a very good thing of all these social media platforms banning him.
Do you have a suggestion to help Trump supporters feel that their guy got a fair deal these past four years?
How can you convince someone something is true who doesn't believe in truth or facts to begin with? You can't. That's like convincing someone they were dreaming before they've woken up. For years they have been the party of "alternative facts" and "your logic", denying science and objective reality. It is not our job to make them feel better about the lies they were told that didn't pan out.
@Admin I think you missed your calling. Suggesting that it is our responsibility to "help Trump supporters feel that their guy got a fair deal these last four years" is pure comedy gold!
Do I give One Rat's Ass what a drump supporter may want or "think"?????? You must be ingesting substances!